FGW - Buffet car row continues
FGW - Buffet car row continues
Ref.: thisisbath - 17 August 2006
Link to online source
--------------------------------
Rotten service from un-Great Western
Disgusting double talk is offered by the smiling manager director of Bath's First Great Western rail service as she informs us that they are eliminating the buffet car and packing seats closer.
She knows, and we know, that a little trolley crawling through a seven carriage train will not give passengers a better service. Firstly the trolley will not offer nearly the same range of food and drink. Secondly, with the buffet car, passengers can go and obtain refreshments when they want them, and not when the trolley comes by.
Also these trolleys have an annoying tendency to be off duty most of the time.
Ah, but in reducing the cost of carrying that buffet car, the rail company also plans to pack seats closer together and, with its new 'airline seating' most likely reduce or eliminate those tables seating four passengers.
Altogether rotten service in more cramped conditions. More money for First (unGreat) Western whose research will also have told it that this virtually monopolistic travel system means we are stuck with whatever it does, or doesn't, give us.
But, of course, the research also probably tells it that with petrol prices so high their passengers are unlikely to switch to car travel no matter how rotten its service.
Can Great Western just do this without some form of Government approval as part of its rail licence?
Are B &NES councillors lodging an objection, seeing that it will make tourist travel to Bath less amenable and pleasant?
KARL JAEGER
Bath Environment Campaign
Link to online source
--------------------------------
Rotten service from un-Great Western
Disgusting double talk is offered by the smiling manager director of Bath's First Great Western rail service as she informs us that they are eliminating the buffet car and packing seats closer.
She knows, and we know, that a little trolley crawling through a seven carriage train will not give passengers a better service. Firstly the trolley will not offer nearly the same range of food and drink. Secondly, with the buffet car, passengers can go and obtain refreshments when they want them, and not when the trolley comes by.
Also these trolleys have an annoying tendency to be off duty most of the time.
Ah, but in reducing the cost of carrying that buffet car, the rail company also plans to pack seats closer together and, with its new 'airline seating' most likely reduce or eliminate those tables seating four passengers.
Altogether rotten service in more cramped conditions. More money for First (unGreat) Western whose research will also have told it that this virtually monopolistic travel system means we are stuck with whatever it does, or doesn't, give us.
But, of course, the research also probably tells it that with petrol prices so high their passengers are unlikely to switch to car travel no matter how rotten its service.
Can Great Western just do this without some form of Government approval as part of its rail licence?
Are B &NES councillors lodging an objection, seeing that it will make tourist travel to Bath less amenable and pleasant?
KARL JAEGER
Bath Environment Campaign
-
tugboatcharly2
- regular
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: north somerset
lousy service on great western trains
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 22,00.html
fuel to the fire - or a flash in the pan...
Almost as bad as having an automatic tea or coffee machine in the workplace.
Airline seats + no buffet car = purgatory.
http://michael527.fotopic.net/
fuel to the fire - or a flash in the pan...
Almost as bad as having an automatic tea or coffee machine in the workplace.
Airline seats + no buffet car = purgatory.
http://michael527.fotopic.net/
-
tugboatcharly2
- regular
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: north somerset
how not to run a railway service
- stationcat
- regular
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:57 pm
- Location: North Somerset
As a train planner with considerable experience in working with this squalid little outfit. if they can't improve puctuality with all the "fiddle time" in the schedules, removing the buffet car will make minimal difference. After all, going from 2+7 to 2+8 made little difference. The real reason is purely down to leasing costs, a buffet car is very limited in its capacity for "bums on seats". 
Stationcat
-
tugboatcharly2
- regular
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: north somerset
bums on seats
If the piddling little company cant afford the leasing of one coach in the train then why don't they give it back to people who knew at least how to give it ago with nowhere near the subsidy they are getting now nothing but a gang of failed supermarket managers? running the show .End of subject for me because First Great Western is never going to be any good except as a money making machine. 
- stationcat
- regular
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:57 pm
- Location: North Somerset
- horace
- regular
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:09 pm
- Location: Deepest darkest Wiltshire
- Contact:
sardine tins
I have added my comment added to evening post see link below.
http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/displayN ... 3726#views
Basically i am concerned that once the buffet car goes, next will be the seats then next we will have the japanese type underground station attendant that pushes us through the carriage doors. just imaging how many you can pack in a train like that. now that will really help get more of us in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/displayN ... 3726#views
Basically i am concerned that once the buffet car goes, next will be the seats then next we will have the japanese type underground station attendant that pushes us through the carriage doors. just imaging how many you can pack in a train like that. now that will really help get more of us in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!