Cheltenham could lose its railway station
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:16 pm
Ref: thisisgloucestershire.co.uk
http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/ ... K=12739380
==========================
HANDS OFF OUR RAILWAY STATION - IT HAS TO STAY
10:30 - 01 July 2005
Cheltenham could lose its railway station if plans to build a Parkway station between Cheltenham and Gloucester get the go-ahead.
The scheme is part of the county council's long-term transport plans and has the backing of Gloucester MP Parmjit Dhanda But Cheltenham MP Martin Horwood fears the plans could leave the town's station out of the loop.
Currently Virgin's cross country services stop at Cheltenham and Gloucester.
But two years ago the company axed 18 of its 20 cross country services into Gloucester.
Virgin has already said its preference would be to serve only one station in the area.
So if Gloucester Parkway is built at Elmbridge Court all services could be transferred there.
First Great Western's franchise for trains to London is also up for grabs.
Any decision on the Parkway could affect those routes running in and out of Cheltenham.
Elmbridge Court, at the Gloucester end of the A40 Golden Valley bypass, has already been identified by the Strategic Rail Authority as the best location for a new station.
The SRA says there is a positive case for the project, following an assessment carried out last year.
However, Mr Horwood says he will fight tooth and nail to defend the town's station.
He said: "It's vital for Cheltenham's economic future that the town retains its own railway station with an extensive range of intercity services.
"I'm certainly not giving unqualified support to the parkway station because there's the potential that it might take services away from Cheltenham Spa." He has written to the SRA and Virgin asking for a commitment to maintain services to Cheltenham.
"If that can be done and we can have a parkway station as well, that's fine," said Mr Horwood.
"If the impact is to negatively impact services in Cheltenham I'll be opposing it."
Cheltenham borough councillor John Morris is also concerned.
He said: "The main thing we've to look at in relation to the parkway is to make sure the transport structures that are already there aren't impeded or cancelled.
"Cheltenham station is vital to the town. If it was taken out of the frame it could be at worst the death knell for any growth in Cheltenham."
http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/ ... K=12739380
==========================
HANDS OFF OUR RAILWAY STATION - IT HAS TO STAY
10:30 - 01 July 2005
Cheltenham could lose its railway station if plans to build a Parkway station between Cheltenham and Gloucester get the go-ahead.
The scheme is part of the county council's long-term transport plans and has the backing of Gloucester MP Parmjit Dhanda But Cheltenham MP Martin Horwood fears the plans could leave the town's station out of the loop.
Currently Virgin's cross country services stop at Cheltenham and Gloucester.
But two years ago the company axed 18 of its 20 cross country services into Gloucester.
Virgin has already said its preference would be to serve only one station in the area.
So if Gloucester Parkway is built at Elmbridge Court all services could be transferred there.
First Great Western's franchise for trains to London is also up for grabs.
Any decision on the Parkway could affect those routes running in and out of Cheltenham.
Elmbridge Court, at the Gloucester end of the A40 Golden Valley bypass, has already been identified by the Strategic Rail Authority as the best location for a new station.
The SRA says there is a positive case for the project, following an assessment carried out last year.
However, Mr Horwood says he will fight tooth and nail to defend the town's station.
He said: "It's vital for Cheltenham's economic future that the town retains its own railway station with an extensive range of intercity services.
"I'm certainly not giving unqualified support to the parkway station because there's the potential that it might take services away from Cheltenham Spa." He has written to the SRA and Virgin asking for a commitment to maintain services to Cheltenham.
"If that can be done and we can have a parkway station as well, that's fine," said Mr Horwood.
"If the impact is to negatively impact services in Cheltenham I'll be opposing it."
Cheltenham borough councillor John Morris is also concerned.
He said: "The main thing we've to look at in relation to the parkway is to make sure the transport structures that are already there aren't impeded or cancelled.
"Cheltenham station is vital to the town. If it was taken out of the frame it could be at worst the death knell for any growth in Cheltenham."