the green mile wrote: Personally, now I am older and wiser, I would never support management stepping in to try and keep things going during a dispute. If there's a genuine issue, get it sorted.
Couldn't agree more. I think that one of the problems in the "old days" was that the class divisions that had become ingrained on both sides often got in the way of reasonable discussion. Just to pull this conversation back to Bath Road for a moment, I recall an occasion when Basil Edwards had had a "falling out" with an electrician (can't remember who unfortunately) and Basil wanted him up on a charge of "insubordination." It was pointed out to Basil politely that he was no longer in the forces
Memory of names is very shaky this morning, but there was also a top link passenger guard who had comiitted some minor misdemeanour or other and had been hauled up in front of Ken Watkins, who started raising his voice to him. The guard walked out of the office, came back about 10 seconds later and said: "Sorry, I went out to see who you were shouting at" I wonder who won that round?
All that said, it does of course depend which side is being the more unreasonable. When you spoke in last night's post of "the strike" I was thinking of the one that happened after the 50s came to Bristol, but of course you were talking about a later one that happened after I'd left 82A. The "50s" strike was caused by both sides taking extreme positions:
Staff -"You've given us crap to maintain and we're losing financially as a result"
Management - "You're skilled men - get and do the job properly that we're paying you for"
A compromise was of course eventually reached. After a 3-week strike. A bit more common sense and willingness to negotiate on both sides should have avoided strike action completely.
the green mile wrote: Otherwise it drags on, customers drift away
Abso-bloody-lutely. The only time when a strike can really "work" from a staff side point of view is when they have a virtual monopoly on the supply of whatever product they produce. ASLEF shot itself, and the railway industry, in the foot in the 1955 strike because railways were no longer in the position of power in the national transport system that they once were. Traffic left the railway during the strike and was never regained.
Similarly, the miners thought they were more powerful than they actually were when they took on the Thatcher government in 1984. When you can import coal cheaper than you can dig it out of the ground in this country, the unions were up for a hiding that they eventually took. And in the meantime, the men involved had no pay for a year.
To bring things up to date, the BA strikes of last year were doomed to failure from the outset for exactly the same reasons. BA does not have anything near a monopoly on the UK airline industry - there are plenty of other carriers at Heathrow that are more than happy to take BA's business if they can't provide their service