Page 4 of 4

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:53 pm
by Mitch
I may be able to shed some light on the matter of Bristol's double deckers. A lot of re-bodying and renumbering was carried out after the war years and into the 1950's. JAE 765 was a Bristol K6A new in May 1946 to the city fleet with a lowbridge Strachan body, so the LC prefix to its original fleetnumber was correct. In 1956 it received a second hand highbridge E.C.W. body (from C3067) and was renumbered C3481.
HHY 586 was a Bristol K6A new in November 1944 with a lowbridge Strachan body, fleet number 3642. It gained an L prefix in 1946. In April 1955 it received a second hand highbridge E.C.W. body ( from 3042) and was renumbered 3785.
My wife now wants a divorce: she married a sad man :lol:

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:24 pm
by Robin Summerhill
Mitch wrote:I may be able to shed some light on the matter of Bristol's double deckers. A lot of re-bodying and renumbering was carried out after the war years and into the 1950's. JAE 765 was a Bristol K6A new in May 1946 to the city fleet with a lowbridge Strachan body, so the LC prefix to its original fleetnumber was correct. In 1956 it received a second hand highbridge E.C.W. body (from C3067) and was renumbered C3481.
HHY 586 was a Bristol K6A new in November 1944 with a lowbridge Strachan body, fleet number 3642. It gained an L prefix in 1946. In April 1955 it received a second hand highbridge E.C.W. body ( from 3042) and was renumbered 3785.
My wife now wants a divorce: she married a sad man :lol:
You are not the only sad man around here, but at least you've allowed us to get to the bottom of this conundrum :)

Can we now get back to railways do you think? :mrgreen:

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:59 pm
by Mitch
Yes please, we've strayed way too far off topic :oops:

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:56 am
by Splodge
Whitchurch Halt, were the platforms concrete/brick? Are they still there under the field?

Also has any one seen any photos of Chelwood Bridge before it became a roundabout, like the bridge at west town lane Ive looked for ages & never found a pic of what it was like. How did both roads go over the railway, I assume 2 bridges? (but then it would have been known as Chelwood bridges) :?

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:17 pm
by Robin Summerhill
Splodge wrote: ... has any one seen any photos of Chelwood Bridge before it became a roundabout, like the bridge at west town lane Ive looked for ages & never found a pic of what it was like. How did both roads go over the railway, I assume 2 bridges? (but then it would have been known as Chelwood bridges) :?
Imagine you are going south, coming up from Pensford.

As you approached the bridge, the Bath/ Marksbury Road came in on your left immediately before it.

Once over the bridge, the Bishop Sutton/ West Harptree road went off immediately to the right.

If I remember correctly, there were traffic lights on the bridge in later years.

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:22 pm
by StrawberryLine
Ditto Robin's remarks, I am pretty sure there was quite a bit of re-alignment of both roads, and that there were traffic lights in later years before the roundabout. As for Whitchurch halt have a look at http://www.tventon.freeserve.co.uk/whit.htm he has a bit about his model of Whitchurch halt on there and I am sure he would have researched it pretty thoroughly before he built it.

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:02 pm
by jules
there were traffic lights in later years before the roundabout.
Yes there were - I remember queuing at them frequently in the 60's.

If I recall correctly, as the railway was basically crossing a flat field at this point, the road junction was built on a mound/hump over the railway. This was flattened when they put the roundabout in.

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:59 pm
by nickt
Splodge wrote:Whitchurch Halt, were the platforms concrete/brick? Are they still there under the field?

Worth having a look at website for Clutton village. There are a number of railway photos one of which shows whitchurch halt. If I can link to it I will post here. Looking across from bridge there seems to be a slight mound where platform would have been, I can only assume it is just beneath surface.

Yer tis... http://www.clutton.org.uk/gallery/railw ... hoto20.jpg

Looks like natural stone (walls) construction to me, not sure about platform surface.