stantheman wrote:
I think there may be a little confusion here. I was not answering the question about the West Town Lane railway bridge. I am aware the photo referred to is of a Lodekka. I was purely pointing out that lowbridge Bristol Ks did work under the bridge at some time. The photo I quoted in 'The Green Years' (page 69) showed two Ks on route 36 passing. This was not in West Town Lane. The vehicles concerned were LC3377 (JAE 765) and L3642 (HHY 586).
I lived in Lawrence Weston and used to catch the Lodekka 145 route to get to Bristol Speedway on Friday evenings. After the meeting I would walk along to West Town Lane bridge to catch the bus home and therefore get a seat before it filled up on Wells Road.
Now this is getting interesting (but what it has to do with the Bristol
RAILWAY Archive I'm not too sure)
Ah well, in for a penny .....
The vehicles you mention are just before my time (well, certainly 3642), but my Ian Allan British Bus Fleets book throws up some more information.
Fleet number 3377 falls into the range 3354 to 3394, which were Bristol K (W)s built in 1945/46 (although 3377 had been withdrawn at the time my book was published). These were not Lowbridge variants, but "normal height" buses. However, searching that book for JAE 765 shows that this registration number was carried by fleet number 3481, another K(W) introduced in 1946, and once again a "full height" bus, not a Lowbridge variant.
The book also tells me that registration number HHY 586 was carried by fleet number 3785, another full height K(W) introduced in 1944/45 and rebodied in 1949/50. But 3785 was not a Lowbridge variant because it did not carry an "L" prefix. The earliest example I can find on the internet of the Lowbridge variant being produced was in 1948.
http://buspics.net/buspics1.html
From another field of "sad case research" I have been involved in over the years, I know that registration numbers were frequently re-used prior to the "ABC 123 A" format introduced in 1963, but they would not have been swapped between vehicles whilst still on the road. So, we are left with a number of conflicting scenarios:
1. The Ian Allan Bus Fleets series contains errors in fleet numbers and/or registration numbers
2. Martin Curtis's book contains errors in that the two buses depicted were not actually prefixed "L" no matter what the photograph caption may say (unfortunately the book appears to be out of print and there are no secondhand copies for sale in any of the usual internet oulets)
3. The service 36 buses as depicted in Martin Curtis's book may well have been working service 36, but at the time the photographs were taken the 36's route did not include going under West Town Lane bridge, because full height double deckers would not fit under it. On that, at least, we are certain! If anybody has a copy of the book and can scan the appropriate photograph so that we can all have a look it would be helpful
If anybody else can add any further information that would be useful. All the data I supplied above comes from Ian Allan British Bus Fleets no.13 (Bristol) published I believe in 1963, and is on pages 20 and 21 of that book. If anybody else has a copy please have a look and confirm one way or the other.
If you don't have a copy and are really really that interested, there's one for sale on Ebay at the moment
http://shop.ebay.co.uk/?_from=R40&_trks ... Categories - the only problem is the bloke wants 18 quid for it
