Irritates me so much I refuse to buy anything from any company whose database is 16 years out of date - and I tell them so.The thing that particularly irritates me as a resident of Bristol is when filling in my address online I am required to state the county.
If forced to provide a county in the address, I always put "Bristol" as the county as well, which it is. If it is a drop down list which does not include Bristol as a selection, I simply go elsewhere. I absolutely refuse to use Avon (as it hasn't existed since 1996) and I certainly refuse to use Gloucesteshire or Somerset, which hasn't been true since 1373!
From a system architect's perspective, Bristol is not at all unusual. It is not that it doesn't have a county - it IS a county in its own right, so any system I build or advise on has Bristol in the underlying data and it appears as a county choice. The lesson here is to ensure that the underlying data is accurate and not to try and "massage" it to fit the (misconceived) exceptions into the programmer's otherwise convenient view of the world.
In the case of Bristol, this results in addresses being printed as "Bristol, Bristol" - which is dead easy to filter out one of the Bristols (or any other such needless repeated line) prior to producing output. But the real thing is: addresses with post codes absolutely no longer require a county name - they just require the post town and actually at minimum, just the post code and house number/name. From 2016, counties will not even appear in the Royal Mail's address database. See:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... esses.html
Unpopular I know, but that's progress for you! (Stands back as Mr Summerhill comes to the boil!