I heard yesterday about a walker who nearly walked into a stationary cyclists in one of the tunnels, as the latter had stopped in one of the 'dark zones'!
Cyclists and walkers trying to avoid each other on paths. towpaths etc is not usually too bad provided that you can see each other approaching ...
Search found 42 matches
- Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:43 pm
- Forum: In The News & Press Releases
- Topic: two tunnels footpath
- Replies: 36
- Views: 2177
- Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:37 pm
- Forum: In The News & Press Releases
- Topic: two tunnels footpath
- Replies: 36
- Views: 2177
- Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:38 pm
- Forum: In The News & Press Releases
- Topic: two tunnels footpath
- Replies: 36
- Views: 2177
Certainly the fencing at the Midford goods-yard end is permanent - as I said, they have copied the old-style railway fencing. In the Tucking Mill area it appears from a distance to be chain-link, and AIUI the same at Lyncombe Vale.
On existing parts of this route and others, there is usually quite ...
On existing parts of this route and others, there is usually quite ...
- Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:17 pm
- Forum: In The News & Press Releases
- Topic: two tunnels footpath
- Replies: 36
- Views: 2177
- Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:24 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Bath Green Park March 2006
- Replies: 3
- Views: 352
- Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:54 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: BBC4 Railway Collection
- Replies: 1
- Views: 248
- Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:14 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Michael Portillo on the West Somerset Railway
- Replies: 48
- Views: 1349
I watched that programme and also the one on the following day on the L&BR etc. I found it confusing in the latter when he was at Barnstaple (Junction) and talking about the run-down of the line to Exeter, yet this was accompanied by archive shots of Lynton and the L&BR!
Curious that, in a series ...
Curious that, in a series ...
- Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:18 pm
- Forum: In The News & Press Releases
- Topic: Landslip near Westerleigh
- Replies: 2
- Views: 589
- Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:24 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Cycling Over Bath Road Bridge!!
- Replies: 52
- Views: 2393
- Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:28 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Cycling Over Bath Road Bridge!!
- Replies: 52
- Views: 2393
I have to take issue here with Robin, as I feel he is being too lenient in respect of the WSR cyclists.
IMHO the adult (father?) was setting a VERY BAD example to the child, who may well now feel that it is quite OK to do such things in future. The child may be below the age of responsibility, but ...
IMHO the adult (father?) was setting a VERY BAD example to the child, who may well now feel that it is quite OK to do such things in future. The child may be below the age of responsibility, but ...
- Mon Oct 29, 2012 1:17 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Cycling Over Bath Road Bridge!!
- Replies: 52
- Views: 2393
- Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:20 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Mystery location
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4215
I had wondered if perhaps Morten had taken a ride down the Clevedon branch, then up the WC&P and back via the Portishead branch (or the other way around). Buts, as you say, why then stop off at Portbury, whereas changing trains at Durston has some value as an argument. I think you will see why I am ...
- Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:16 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Mystery location
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4215
I was running another discussion elsewhere at http://www.signalbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4346&p=51218&hilit=Durston+Branch#p51218 which took it a little further. In essence there were yes/no views on both locations.
I would not say that Durston Branch was definitely ruled out, any more that ...
I would not say that Durston Branch was definitely ruled out, any more that ...
- Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:30 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Mystery location
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4215
As AndyK has said, we are talking about the original Portbury (station) box, not the later Portbury Shipyard (at a different location). The former closed 1896, the latter opened 1918.
I agree that the circumstantial evidence is indeed very strong, I just would not like to say that it definitely WAS ...
I agree that the circumstantial evidence is indeed very strong, I just would not like to say that it definitely WAS ...
- Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:33 pm
- Forum: General Chat & Needs and Wants
- Topic: Mystery location
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4215